Refine Your Search
Limit Search Result
Type of Material
  • (3)
  •  
Subject
  • (1)
  • (1)
  • (1)
  • (1)
  •  
Author
  • (1)
  • (1)
  • (1)
  • (1)
  •  
Series
  • (1)
  •  
Publication Date
    Target Audience
    • (2)
    •  
    Accelerated Reader
    Reading Count
    Lexile
    Book Adventure
    Fountas And Pinnell
    Collection
    • (2)
    • (1)
    •  
    Library
    • (3)
    •  
    Availability
    • (3)
    Search Results: Returned 3 Results, Displaying Titles 1 - 3
    • share link
      2018., McGill-Queen's University Press Call No: SC 320.540 B426n    Availability:1 of 1     At Your Library Series Title: Democracy, diversity, and citizen engagement series   Volume: 3.Summary Note: In Quebec and Scotland, questions of constitutional change, national identity, and national grievance play an important role in the electoral calculations of political parties and voters. Taking a strong stance on the national question can have strategic benefits both for parties pushing for greater autonomy and for those endorsing the status quo. In this in-depth look at issue voting, authors Éric Bélanger, Richard Nadeau, Ailsa Henderson, and Eve Hepburn examine how the national question affects political parties and voter behaviour in both substate nations. Through party manifestos, interviews with legislators, and opinion survey data, this book demonstrates that calls for constitutional change influence political debate, competition, voter choice, and the outcome of elections not only within Quebec and Scotland but also across Canada and the United Kingdom. Minority nationalist parties, the authors show, can gain support by claiming ownership of issues with widespread public agreement, such as self-determination and protecting the identity and interests of the nation. A comprehensive analysis of recent electoral politics, The National Question and Electoral Politics in Quebec and Scotland greatly enhances our understanding of the electoral impact of substate nationalism.
    • share link
      c2009., Baraka Books Call No: QWF 971.428 J13r c.2    Availability:1 of 1     At Your Library Summary Note: As a by-election eventually won by Irish immigrant and newspaper editor Daniel Tracey drew to a close in May 1832, magistrates supporting his opponent, loyalist Stanley Bagg, called in the British troops from the local garrison. Ordered to open fire on a supposed mob, the troops killed three innocent bystanders following what has been qualified ever since as a riot. James Jackson establishes that the riot simply never happened and that there was no mob when soldiers opened fire. His proof is corroborated by affidavits presented to a packed grand jury that exonerated the soldiers and officers and the magistrates who called in the troops. The grand jury comprised a majority of recently arrived English-speaking Protestant farmers even though the three victims were French Canadian and Catholic. Most troubling is the fact that historians have not questioned the official story. In this historical “whodunit,” James Jackson is a one-man investigative commission, combining the moral indignation of an Émile Zola and the writing talent and historical perspective of a Pierre Berton. Although the names of François Languedoc, Pierre Billet and Casimir Chauvin have been forgotten, their story deserves to be known.